Has India really moved on?
October 2, 2010 by Amitabh Tripathi
Since lucknow bench of Allahabad high court reserved its verdict on long awaited title suit on Shree Ramajanmabhoomi case in July this year an aggressive campaign was launched from media outlets that India has moved on and has become mature enough to go beyond the polarized and identity politics and it raise serious questions about intentions and ideas behind this campaign as no one has tried to nail out those elements.
On 30th of September when judgment was delivered it was interesting to see how these media outlets interprerate this verdict. It was highly surprising for me to witness a slight bias in media coverage in favor of secular cult which has become a dominant cult in India ever India got independence. This was the very secular cult which was campaigning for supposed moving on India. The one thing which surprised me a lot on the media coverage the way media headlines were made rather than highlighting the consensus view of judges of having faith on the circumstantial evidence and belief of billions of Hindus that disputed land is the birth place of Lord Rama media went for the division of disputed land in three parts as the highlight of verdict. It was rather amusing and disgusting to see the attitude of bias media approach on this whole issue but was it media alone responsible for this role the answer will be big no, because media was only manifestation of the will of a tiny minority secular cult which want to rule India with its imposed views and propaganda. In the broad day light of interpretation of verdict this secular cult was defeated at that very point of time as their edifice of false assumptions and propaganda has fall and broken into pieces and they we were not ready to accept the defeat and move on.
How secularists defeated- When we talk about secularism in India we must accept one fact very prominently in our mind that secularism in India has been make hostage of fraudulent academia and anti-Hindu polity in India which has exploited it at every moment to brand the Indian spiritual and cultural eternity as the biggest hindrance in development of the nation as well as regressive step in marching towards advancement and modernity.
The stake were high on this verdict for both of parties but test of secularist cult was always high in this verdict and anticipating it very well this cult with their progenies in media outlets campaigned aggressively that India has moved on and tried their best to deflect the whole debate from intellectual fraud and academic fraud cum secularism to genuine nationalistic ideology.
Verdict of Shree Ramajanmbhommi has been delivered in more than thousands of pages so it will be very long drawn job to read out every passage and then come out with every observations but few conclusions can be drawn and one of them is paramount that majority of judges were of consensus view that the central dome is the exact place where Hindus believe from millions of years that this is the place where shree Ram appeared and archeological survey of India report has also vindicated that a mosque was built on the ruins of a massive Hindu structure. These two conclusions must have been drawn into debate which were the biggest victory in this case and big slap on the face of secularists who always stand between shree Ramajanmbhommi movement and their false assumptions as raising the serious doubts about moral authority and legitimacy of the whole movement. The whole edifice of false propaganda and academic fraud of secularists and their company has been demolished with this verdict but this has never come in debate in media and the efforts were made to portray this verdict in this light of secular interpretration as one self made secular reporter from one prominent channel declared this verdict as secular verdict. This is very alarming signal as it shows no efforts were made to create any alternative approach to snatch this whole debate from the jaws of so called secularist cult.
The whole citadel of secular cult was established on one fact that Shree Ramananmbhommi movement was nothing more other than to incite communal passion and has nothing to do with national integration and this whole debate with this assumptions for a long time tried to deflect the whole debate of importance of unfinished historical issues and unfulfilled issues of Hindu consciousness in nation building.
Since time immemorial Hindus had never surrendered their right to define nationalism in a way that becomes synonymous to Hindu nationalism. The apologetic thinking and undue compromise to break the definition of spiritual and cultural eternity with Indian nationhood bring the catastrophe of partition before us when we did not listen to the time to take the independence as an opportunity to connect ourselves with our ancestral spiritual and cultural eternity and instead of this we fall short of imported definitions without enthusing it in our context and secularism is one of them which has got mixed up in Indian context with liberal leftist cum atheist anti Hindu cult. This cult in spite of its tiny minority reach has ruled the elite and acaedmeic world in India but the verdict on Ayodhya issue has proved that beginning of the end of their era and has started and new churning in ideological world in India will be beginning soon and in this way India has moved on?
Last 5 posts by Amitabh Tripathi
- Israel’s Muslims reach out: strategy, desperation or appeasement? – September 27th, 2010
- Time to policy shift not to bleed and weep – September 26th, 2010
- Buying the peace on higher cost – October 4th, 2009
- The Goldstone Report – A Study in Bias – September 17th, 2009
- New Government’s Iran dilemma – May 9th, 2009